Talking Heads reporter Colin MacGregor once worked with Edward Reid in a cabaret show in Glasgow. Recently, he caught up with the Britain’s Got Talent star to discuss his three Wellbeing & Happiness Workshops at this year’s Scottish Mental Health Arts & Film Festival, as well as his Britain’s Got Talent audition and his entertainment idols.

It was a normal Saturday night when I settled down to eat my dinner and watch Saturday night TV. Britain’s Got Talent was my programme choice and I would lift my head between mouthfuls with a casual interest, until one name was announced – Edward Reid. My brain was telling me I knew the name, but I couldn’t connect it until I saw him walk on – yes, it was the same Edward I had worked with for a couple of years in a cabaret show.

Now, Edward seemed quite a shy guy to me but here he was on national TV. His performance was legendary and will live in many peoples memories, and he deserved to progress. Moving on a couple of years, I was asked to step in for someone and do a show in Ayrshire. Who was on the programme for the night but Edward! I sat in fascination as I watched a man who had developed from those early days into a fantastically funny, entertaining performer. To me, Edward now deserves the accolade of being one of Scotland’s top performers and we at SMHAFF are lucky to have him hosting his workshops at venues across Lanarkshire this year.

Edward, you’re part of four events at this year’s Scottish Mental Health Arts & Film Festival. Why do you so kindly put yourself forward for these events?

I was involved last year working with Soundsational and I loved it. This year I wanted to work with Soundsational again because I love what they do but I also wanted to do something on my own. I've been training as a meditation teacher with the British School of Meditation and wanted to mix that with the performance aspect of what I do. The Wellbeing & Happiness workshops are a mix of music, chat and guided meditation. The aim of the workshop is for people to get still with meditation, laugh with the chat and then move to music. 

How do you perceive programs like Britain’s Got Talent? You were a great act before you had success on this programme? But are things like this a necessary steppingstone to get opportunities in Scotland?

I have great memories of BGT – it was stressful and needed lots of energy but it helped shape me into who I am today. Going on a show like that, you need to know who you are and what your worth is. So I'm thankful for the process, which made me step up to myself. Appearing on these shows [gives you a] great profile, but it’s then up to you to show everyone that you will work hard and will get on with everyone in a professional manner.

How confident were you on the night of your BGT audition?

I wasn’t confident at all as it could have gone either way. However, I had belief in myself and knew I had to keep myself safe and loved no matter what happened.

Regarding our cabaret past, what is the worst song you have been ever given to sing?

Oh, there have been lots of songs that initially I didn’t like, but after working on them I kinda fall for them and make them my new baby.

I love your flamboyant dress sense, do you have a stylist, or are you copying me?

LOL. I have always been inspired by you! I don’t have a stylist but I have lots of friends I text outfit pictures to and they tell me yae or nae. Then I ignore them and do what I want! I think when you are on stage you should honour your audience by getting dolled up for them.

Desert Island Mr Reid, one CD to entertain you – which one?

Can I not have Spotify on the Island! We live in an age where the days of buying in LP, tape or even CD and listening to it until you know every word is gone. We have too much choice. I couldn’t choose just one. Maybe I could get YouTube?

I'm going to put my foot down and say you can only have one album.

I can't limit myself to just one. It's very hard. Barbara Streisand Greatest Hits then. 

Who was your idol growing up and how close to their inner personality have you reached as a performer?

As a teenage I loved Kylie – she actually saved my life I think, although I don’t identify with her as a performer. I'm more influenced by the likes of Tina Turner and Diana Ross. Energy and glamour respectively.

The answers you have given, Edward, are very musical, but you’re a very funny man and your stage shows highlight that. So who is your influence in comedy?

I love Joan Rivers. I loved how she put herself down but you still looked up to her. Very talented. 

If you hadn’t been an entertainer, what would you have done?

Before performing, I worked as a carer for people with learning disabilities and loved it. I got into management and wasn’t too keen on that side of it – I was only 24, still a wean. Now I don't know what else I would be – I've no Plan B. Plan A has to work!

If someone had to play you in the Edward Reid Movie, who would it be?

Maybe Danny DeVito! I really have no idea. I've never thought about it but now you mention it I'll add it to my dream board and start visualising it!

Lastly Edward, what do you have to say regarding the stigma of mental health in today’s modern day society?

I think it's definitely becoming more acceptable but I think we as a community don’t know what mental health really is. When promoting my shows I've been stressing that we all have mental health, just like physical health. We all need to keep it in good shape. There are varying levels of health both mental and physical and as a community we should support each other.

by Colin MacGregor

 

Edward Reid's Wellbeing & Happiness workshops takes place on Tue 18 Oct at East Kilbride Arts Centre, Wed 26 Oct at Rutherglen Town Hall and Thu 27 Oct at The Town House, Hamilton. All workshops are free and tickets can be reserved at sllcboxoffice.co.uk.

Moving away from home to start university was possibly one of the hardest things I’ve ever had to do. Filled with enthusiasm at the idea of living far away from what I hated most about my city, I was suddenly hit by the ugliness of reality. And the aftermath was bad. The words of a nurse from my high school trying to help me after my very first panic attack resounded in my head: “If you don’t talk about it, it will get worse, until you won’t be able to leave your house anymore”.

Unfortunately, the premonition turned out to be right. Too afraid to tell my family how unhappy I was in Scotland, knowing they would want me to go back home, secretly disappointed by my weakness, I decided to pretend everything was fine. But of course that didn’t help. The only thing that seemed to give me some relief was watching films before going to bed. This is something my family has always done. Punctually, after dinner, we would all sit on the couch, pretending to watch a film, but actually just slowly falling asleep next to each other. By the time credits rolled, everyone would try and comment on a film no one had actually seen before finally heading to bed.

Since most days I was actually feeling too bad to leave my room, or my bed even, for a while I spent my time taking naps, preceded by a film. On one of my good days, I ended up talking to someone who told me about how they had managed to watch 365 films in one year. Secretly happy to accept the challenge and give some sort of direction to my new favourite hobby, I waited until New Year’s Eve to finally start counting.

Film number one was Aladdin. I watched it while drunk, miserable and surrounded by people I didn’t know that well. The underwhelming celebrations of the start of 2015 led us somehow to watch a film we all knew and loved. And deep down inside it felt quite cosy and familiar after all. After that, I went back to watching films mostly alone, trying to pick classics and cults at first, but slowly just ending up watching whatever was available on Netflix. I then decided to explore what independent cinema had to offer, until I found myself watching very obscure experimental films on Youtube, and eventually went back to classics.

To my big surprise, from the very beginning, people seemed to be genuinely interested in what I was doing. This provided me with a perfect ice-breaker and conversation starter, one that actually led to interesting chats and helped me feeling more comfortable around people. After three or four of months, I actually felt like I had a lot to say about films and consequentially didn’t feel too nervous about talking to someone new.

Films brought me closer to others in a number of ways. From establishing the ‘Film and Pizza Tuesday Night’ in my flat to joining various cinema-related clubs and societies at university, every little step helped, but the main way this experience changed me is a less obvious one. I started spending some quality time with myself. Going to the cinema or having a meal alone seems to be a stigma most people can’t get over. But sometimes treating yourself with a ticket to your favourite director’s new film and a bucket of popcorn you won’t have to worry about sharing with anyone can actually turn a bad week into a good one. By spending more time alone I got to know myself and learn how to listen to my body’s needs, whether it be a break or a hug.

Despite me noting all the titles of the films watched in 2015, some have inevitably faded in my memory, while I’m sure others will stay with me for years ahead. Alongside some indisputable masterpieces such as 12 Angry Men and Casablanca, and some underestimated pearls such as Amores Perros and A Separation, I believe two films in particular are worth of mention. It’s Such a Beautiful Day was the film that really made my year memorable and my challenge special. Don Hertzfeldt’s odd animation explores the life and fragile psyche of Bill, a not very expressive yet incredibly humane stick-figure. The sounds and visual effects used by Hertzfeldt evoked intense feelings I still look back to when going through a really bad time. Bill’s direct and sincere story had a surprisingly delicate aftertaste and life after It’s Such a Beautiful Day has been somehow lighter. 

I’m Starting from Three was one of the few films I watched with my mother. Written and directed by Massimo Troisi, the film follows Gaetano’s adventures as he decides to leave his small town. Besides Gaetano’s fears and worries being highly relatable to mine, I’m Starting from Three showed me sides of my country of origin I have never experienced. It left me with a faint yet comforting sense of belonging and being able to share that moment with my mother was priceless.

Delicate life portraits such as these made me aware of the importance of films as a powerful means of communication. Through the use of various techniques and genres, complex messages and sensations, films can really get across the screen and reach the viewer, leaving marks that words alone could never elicit. As such, it’s hard to put into words what watching these 365 films have done for me or how they have improved my mood and my daily life. But the voice of that nurse from high school has been replaced by Hetzfeldt’s resigned, yet immensely reassuring words: “Isn’t everything amazing?”. Films gave me the strength to listen to myself and speak to others. I feel an indissoluble link between me and the rest of the world now and I know it’s partly because of every single one of those 365 titles.

by Ludovica Credendino

 

This weekend, we have two full days of screenings, selected from this year's International Film Competition at the CCA in Glasgow. Join us to see how this inspiring programme can broaden your understanding and help improve your mental health. Book your tickets here.

WOMEN, INTERRUPTED

A poignant selection of short documentaries and dramas that portray the resilience of women at defining stages of their lives.

Sat 15 Oct, 1pm–3pm

DAN AND MARGOT + DIRECTOR Q&A 

Margot believes she is being stalked and tormented by someone named Dan, but discovers she has schizophrenia. Now, she struggles to build a life as a young independent woman, while trying to reclaim the years she lost to the disorder. A brave and honest look at mental health, stigma and moving forward.

Sat 15 Oct, 4pm–6pm

A FAMILY AFFAIR + DIRECTOR Q&A

When Tom Fassaert’s 95-year-old grandmother invites him to visit her in South Africa, all he knows about her are his father’s stories about the 1950s femme fatale who put her two sons in a children’s home. An unexpected confession makes things more complicated than he could have ever imagined.

Sat 15 Oct, 7pm–9.30pm

YOUTH PERSPECTIVE

An inspiring selection of short films addressing mental health in which young people played key creative roles.

Sun 16 Oct, 1pm–2pm

I WISH I WAS THAT BIRD + DIRECTOR Q&A

A candid and intimate portrait of outsider artist James Condos. Screening with Lima, a gorgeous animated film about a son’s struggle to keep the memory of his father alive, and TRANSition, a brave and honest documentary about a young transgender man.

Sun 16 Oct, 2.30pm–4.30pm

MIND/GAME: THE UNQUIET JOURNEY OF CHAMIQUE HOLDSCLAW

MIND/GAME tells the compelling story of basketball phenomenon Chamique Holdsclaw, the “female Michael Jordan”, from her rise to WNBA stardom to her struggle with mental illness and the strength she called on to speak out about it. Preceded by Hula, Robin Haig’s hip-shaking drama about liberation. 

Sun 16 Oct, 5pm–7pm

DAVID

Suffocated by his overprotective parents and tired of being a burden on their lives, a troubled young man decides to leave the security of his family to find himself and his place in life. An intimate coming-of-age story about independence, acceptance and the importance of letting go.

Sun 16 Oct, 8pm–10pm

Talking Heads reporter Callum McLean reviews Pondlife, which was performed at Platform in their Headspace programme at the Scottish Mental Health Arts & Film Festival. The play tells a story, known intimately by most people but neglected in public, which is essential to the modern world.

From the very beginning the world is a strange and confusing place to us. Hence, as soon we acquire a basic understanding of speech and language, most of us attempt to challenge the world we know so little about, demanding more information, questioning everything and everyone, before our juvenile embarrassment slowly blossoms to corrode our once imperative inquisition. The once vocal questions to our esteemed elders quickly retreat to a new place – one equally as strange and confusing as the world around us – ourselves.

Aimed primarily at children aged 9+, Pondlife is a one-man performance. It tells the story of Martin and Simon, two boys who become best friends after Simon, who was raised in Birmingham, moves to Martin’s Scottish school at the beginning of primary five. The two remain inseparable all through the year and the summer, becoming fully content with their own friendship and referring to their more obnoxious seeming peers as ‘Neanderthals’. As time passes, however, Simon’s football skills are noticed by the ‘Neanderthals’, and Simon’s new bond with those he once ridiculed eventually tarnishes the once solid friendship between the two. Simon grows ever keener to avoid Martin and join the other group.

In Pondlife the ‘Neanderthals’ chose who was allowed to hang around with them and those who could not. And it was the ‘Neanderthals’ who could decide what was and was not cool at that time. Who gave this specific group of children this level of stature to call the shots on these subjects at such an age? And why, again, is this story so ever present in today’s world?

Simon was good at football, and this made him far more popular, whereas, at the age of ten, the class consensus was that Martin was not good enough at football to receive an invitation of friendship. An example of the general rule, common on playgrounds everywhere, that a young boy with sporting ability is more respected than one who is not. But at this age, just as a hierarchy of classroom popularity is developing, children never ask: why is this?

At some point in our life, we gain the ability to ask ourselves: what am I and what should I be? Almost subconsciously, we learn the answers through our surroundings. Looking at our peers, the latest top selling musical artists and obsessing over our intuition of the latest trends, we obtain a relatively vast array of knowledge. Despite our self-disciplined education, one which even our older generations notoriously struggle to comprehend, there appears to be rare time for a child to learn to ask: who am I?

After having spent years of quizzing and learning, the most confusing and difficult years to date appear, just as the essential questions of life we so long sought the answers to dissipate into a façade of classroom credibility. Never do we learn at a faster rate than our youth, but can be a time absolutely detrimental to our mental development which will ultimately affect us for the rest of our lives. Although, obviously, it is very important to note how everyone’s development at this time varies, the scale of our lack of education in mental self-reflection cannot be ignored.

If there is one thing the play highlights, it is this serious issue which appears to be ignored far more than it is understood in the modern world. How did a child as young as Simon stop asking what he wanted to know about the world, and focus instead on what he wanted the world to know about him? Of course, the effects of this can be drastic in the long term, as shown in the play, where Simon and Martin’s friendship ended all communication for a total of 30 years.

The performance concludes at the point right before the two meet again, provoking the audience to question how much forgiveness Simon is owed regarding his actions made thirty years before, and thus to question who is to blame for the falling out, with 30 years hindsight.

And in these situations, who is to blame? The answer is more complex than simply naming a ten year old boy. What seems far more plausible is how easily the world around us can educate us in ways in which we are very unaware. This appears true throughout many ages, but the younger we are the more susceptible we appear to this potentially damaging influence.

Although a clear answer to this issue is not immediately apparent, it seems clear that children today can be forced away from anything from their train set to their trend set far too easily against their will. Therefore, one helpful conclusion could be to closer examine the relevance of this play, and the relationship between modern trends and expectations about growing up, which affects the way we ultimately feel comfortable treating each other. It is clear that this discussion should be held far more commonly throughout every stage of our lives.

by Callum McLean

 

MORE EVENTS AT Headspace

Headspace is the Scottish Mental Health Arts & Film Festival's annual programme at Platform in Glasgow, which this year celebrates its first decade. All events are free unless specified. 

CREATIVE COLLECTIVE

Creative Collective members worked with artist Katy Dye on a restorative storytelling project that straddles art, technology and social engagement, bringing people and communities together. This installation takes the form of a recorded, spoken and written word tour of Easterhouse.

10–31 Oct

10am–7pm

THE ART FACTORY

The Art Factory present a large collaborative installation created with artists in residence, Mitch Miller and Heather Lander. Inspired by stories and memories of Greater Easterhouse, members of the The Art Factory have created their own unique community map.

10–31 Oct

10am–7pm

INVISIBLE ARMY

Robbie has noticed that people bump into him in the street and nobody ever really looks at him — they always look to the side or beyond him. This powerful show is all about caring, exploring the life of a young carer and why he feels invisible.

Mon 24 Oct

7–8pm

£8.50 | £5 | £4

EPIC CELEBRATION DAY

A day of celebration featuring some of the innovative projects that have shaped Platform’s first decade. The events reflect Platform’s aspirations of being recognised as a centre for excellence for public engagement, and celebrate examples of innovative practice from around Scotland and beyond.

Fri 28 Oct

11am–5pm

RULES OF THE DANCEFLOOR

A cross-generational interactive performance and audio event that celebrates the stories, histories and communities of Scotland’s dance floors.

Sat 29 Oct

2–3pm

£8.50 | £5 | £4

Now, let me start this review by stating that I am not an easy person to make laugh. I’m nearly hitting my mid-fifties and have slowly, unnoticed, slipped into that bracket of “grumpy old men”, where I stare at some contemporary comics on the TV and wonder where my first laugh will come from. So it was with trepidation – for Felicity, not me – that I took on the role to review her show at the CCA in Glasgow on World Mental Health Day.

We were ten seconds in, yes, ten seconds, when I succumbed to my first uncontrollable burst of laughter, as Felicity opened her show with what seemed like a manic, unscripted, friendly tirade of funny references to herself and her mental state – and indeed the mental state of the audience for being there in the first place on a Monday night! Her opening instantly won everyone over as she emitted total confidence, displaying her natural gift for off the cuff humor through a hilarious Q&A exchange with her audience.

Felicity described how the night would go by stating that the first half would be her flying by the seat of her pants, improvising and trying out some new material. The second half was material taken from her acclaimed show at this year’s Edinburgh Festival Fringe. I have to be honest here and say I preferred the first half, where I felt Felicity’s natural comedic talents really shone through. The second half was very funny in its own right, but more anecdotal and without quite the same ratio of gags fired out in the first half. Having said that, Felicity certainly showed an appetite for performing at this well attended evening. Her overall show was first class and very funny, and this “grumpy old man” has to thank her for that. 

by Colin MacGregor

 

There is a strong comedy programme in the west of Scotland at SMHAFF 2016, including Gary Little's tour and an impressive line-up at The Therapy Room's Comedy Weekender. For for more information about our comedy events, click here

Felicity Ward Image: Andy Hollingworth

More than 50 years after the founding of his most famous project, the radical treatment centre Kingsley Hall, RD Laing is attracting as much attention as ever. He is currently the subject of a play in development from writer and director Pamela Carter and the National Theatre of Scotland, and his Kingsley Hall experiences will form the basis for a forthcoming film, Mad to Be Normal, starring David Tennant. Some of the fascination Laing holds can be explained by the wild, quintessentially 1960s nature of some of his methods, some by his highly unconventional theories about mental illness, and some by the details of his personal life.

Born and raised in Glasgow’s Govanhill, RD Laing trained in psychotherapy in London and went on to develop new theories about the origins of mental illness, focusing on schizophrenia in his book The Divided Self. Laing challenged traditional ideas about diagnosis and the use of treatments such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Downplaying the role of genetics and looking at the importance of social context in sparking mental health problems, he was strongly associated with the anti-psychiatry movement. He pioneered various treatments, encouraging patients to ‘embrace’ their impulses to madness and promoting the experimental use of psychedelic drugs.

Partly as a result of the notoriety these treatments understandably attracted, Laing’s work became well known outside the circles of psychiatry. While many of his theories are now subject to fierce critique, he is seen as having left an important and singular legacy, and his publications are still widely read today.

At the Scottish Mental Health Arts & Film Festival’s day in residence at the National Theatre of Scotland’s Home Away festival, Pamela Carter discussed the development of her play and RD Laing’s legacy with psychiatrist Dr Peter Byrne and The Herald's Keith Bruce in a session titled RD Laing: Biography and Authenticity. Before the event, Talking Heads reporter Emma Lawson spoke to Pamela about the workshop, the issues involved in developing a play about a real person and her views on how RD Laing’s life and work are perceived today.

Could you tell me a bit about the play and what it covers – are you looking primarily at RD Laing’s personal life, or focusing on his work?

I’ve tried to look at his work and him. So it’s definitely about RD Laing but I’ve tried to use RD Laing as a method of procedure, if that makes sense. Rather than say, ‘this is his life’, I’ve tried to be as RD Laing as I can while talking about his ideas and trying to understand his ideas.

I’ve realised that I shouldn’t be writing a biography – I have no right to talk about the person I’ve created as the real RD Laing and I’m certainly not saying that I’m offering any revelations about his life. […] All the sources that I’ve used are public sources, and the biggest – the greatest – expert on RD Laing is RD Laing.

At the RD Laing: Biography and Authenticity session, is there anything in particular that you want to make attendees consider?

No – I’m interested in simply hearing what people think about RD Laing and his legacy – because some people are still quite angry about him.

Yes – because his work is still quite recent, really.

Yeah, because he died in 1989. But in the 60s and 70s, he was on everybody’s lips. And then he totally dropped out of fashion through the late 70s and into the 80s. And there was a real backlash against him as well, with regard to ideas about anti-psychiatry, and there was a feminist backlash as well, and there was also a general embarrassment about aspects of his behaviour and his alcoholism.

I guess some people use his personal flaws to cast doubt on his work.

Yes, absolutely – it’s that idea of ‘Doctor, heal thyself’. But I think he’s amazing – I think it’s an amazing life and amazing work. I find it quite a shock that he disappeared so quickly – from conversations in Scotland as well – conversations about who should be remembered and who should be celebrated.

I feel like he’s rarely acknowledged as Scottish, possibly because most of his work was done in London. I remember seeing they had one of his books at Tramway during the Turner Prize exhibition, and thinking it was nice to see the link.

There’s a great film by Luke Fowler that was nominated for the Turner Prize one year, about RD Laing. Fowler is a Glasgow-based visual artist, and he made a film that was partly drawn from the RD Laing archives, but also cut together with his own filming around Glasgow. It's called All Divided Selves, and it’s a really beautiful film. When I watched it five years ago, it made me realise that I could write a play about this – that there was a different way into it that wasn’t very representational, that wasn’t traditional narrative or biopic from beginning to end.

Sometimes I wonder if Scotland might be collectively embarrassed about RD Laing. By the time we’d got to the late 60s, early 70s, he’d lost it a bit, and I think that’s what people remember. But the work he was doing in the late 50s and 60s, and how he was speaking about madness and agency and communication and understanding, which applies to all our notions and our identity and ourselves, is pretty fantastic and up there in terms of European philosophy – he’s up there with Foucault. So I’m surprised by how little he’s been celebrated, although that’s maybe changing now.

I was wondering what your thoughts were on the relationship between madness and theatre, and about representing mental health issues onstage?

I wanted to talk about Laing’s work and the journey he went on in terms of talking about madness and identity and self, so I started to work out, how do I have those discussions onstage? The way you might do it would be to have the patient and the doctor, but then how do you show someone being mad, or having the experience of madness? I started to feel very uncomfortable. […] There is this conflict between reflective, real investigation of madness and the demands of entertainment.

For a while I had one actor, who would be a patient in all different manifestations of RD Laing’s theories, but then I wanted them to be able to talk back, and it just didn’t work at all. […] That has now gone entirely, so I’m left with a play which I think will be for six actors, all of whom will be RD Laing. The idea being that everyone is clearly an actor – there’s no aspect of ‘I have to look like RD Laing’. Because also I didn’t want to write a play in which a load of middle-aged white men sit around smoking and pulling their beards while women wander around being a bit mad in the background, because frankly if you read the books, that’s really what it comes across as – so it’s how to avoid that onstage as well.

Yes – looking at Kingsley Hall, it’s interesting how his interaction with his patients seems quite gendered.

And there were no female doctors, were there?

No, it’s nearly always the man-as-doctor, woman-as-patient dynamic.

I do find it very interesting – because Laing calls himself a ‘Scottish male chauvinist pig’ […] but I don’t see him as a misogynist at all – I see him certainly as a man of his time, and of his politics, but he also he mainly treated women.

I think it’s interesting that he starts to look at society and see how society demands of the individual certain behaviours. You can see that particularly in the interviews with his female patients. What he doesn’t then make the leap to, possibly because these are women from certain socio-economic backgrounds – working-class, lower-middle-class, where their minds are very constricted, particularly in the stultifying atmosphere of the 1950s – is that possibly women were going mad because there was a disconnect between what they were allowed to be in the world and what they felt themselves to be. But he never made that leap to feminism – to say, okay, this is a patriarchal structure.

When I was researching this piece, I found it quite hard to sum up his ideas – there’s so much there that it’s difficult to simplify.

I spoke to one expert, a clinical psychologist at Maudsley Hospital who has a side-line in the history of psychiatry, and he said that for whatever idea or interest or theory you have in madness and its treatments, you can find a version of Laing to suit you. So if you are anti-establishment or anti-medicine or pro-medicine or whatever your theory is, you can use Laing and find something to fit.

by Emma Lawson

 

Home Away, the National Theatre of Scotland's festival of participatory arts, continues until Wednesday 12 October. For details and tickets visit homeaway2016.com.